Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Midrange | tchuco | 7-2 | None |
Dimir Midrange | fabioo | 8-6 | None |
Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Reanimator , Esper Pixie , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Midrange , Mono Black Demons
Fungal Infection ranks #566 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 11%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Fungal Infection is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Performance Efficiency: 16.31 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Fungal Infection has a win rate of 48.9%, making it 3.3% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Avenging Hunter | Creature — Dragon Ranger | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Blood Fountain | Artifact | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Chainer's Edict | Sorcery | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Crypt Rats | Creature — Rat | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Deadly Dispute | Instant | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Ichor Wellspring | Artifact | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Reckoner's Bargain | Instant | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Snuff Out | Instant | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Spinning Darkness | Instant | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Thorn of the Black Rose | Creature — Human Assassin | 5 | 46.2% | 0 |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Golgari Midrange | 4 | 0.5% | 41.1% |
Dimir Midrange | 3 | 0.1% | 31.4% |
Dimir Control | 1 | 1.1% | 0.0% |
Dimir Reanimator | 1 | 5.0% | 66.7% |
Esper Pixie | 1 | 0.1% | 28.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.